Форум трейдеров » Фьючерсы, опционы, акции (CFD) » Стратегии и Инвестирование
+ Подписаться
Страница 2 из 3 ПерваяПервая 123 ПоследняяПоследняя
  1. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    Из вчерашнего письма от Leeb

    NIGHTMARES FROM THE 70S RETURN

    The market's biggest long-term problem is a word we hate to use again, but we must. That word is stagflation. This is a phenomenon whereby growth slows while inflation accelerates. No matter how we look at it, stagflation appears to be what we have today.

    Stagflation is a confusing and frustrating state of affairs because it defies the normal solutions to economic problems. Normally, if you have inflation, the central bank raises interest rates to curb it. If you have recession or stagnation, the Fed lowers interest rates to stimulate growth.

    What do you do when both inflation and a slowdown occur at the same time?

    Certainly, the Fed appears confused today. In its latest report, it claims to be not biased towards raising rates. On the other hand, it is watching inflation. On the other hand, it is watching growth too. That's too many hands -- a sure sign someone's in a muddle.

    We have made the case before that the current environment is moving into a replay of the 1970s -- the last time stagflation was a problem -- and will grow more like the 1970s over time.

    However, there are also differences between now and the 1970s. First among these are today's the relatively low inflation rate, and the recent strong price performance of long-term bonds. These two differences may soon evaporate.

    Last week, the U.S. Dollar Index fell another 0.65% to close below its November 2006 low. At the rate it's falling, it may soon run out of lows to close below.

    The drop in the dollar is a chink in our economy's armor. It may not lead to recession, but the less our money is worth, the more dollars we will need to buy things. And that's just another way of describing inflation.

    A second difference between today and the 1970s --in fact, it's a parallel to the early 2000s -- is the tremendous amount of debt in the economy. Everywhere we look, debt is at record levels.

    We suspect Mr. Bernanke and his team at the Fed are tossing and turning in their beds at night, worried sick about the debt problem and how it will tie their hands when it comes to managing the economy. Consider what happened during the minor recession that occurred during the early 2000s. Despite the tech crash and 9/11, it was the mildest recession we've ever seen. Compared to the tiger called the Great Depression, this was a newborn kitten of a recession.

    Yet look what the Fed had to do to get us out of the soft claws of that recession -- drop interest rates to near zero, vastly raise government spending, and introduce a flood of liquidity. Why was so much effort needed? Because the economy had the anchor of debt around its neck.

    A recession in today's debt-heavy world is a serious event, even when it's mild. Bernanke's problem, the one we suppose is rolling back and forth through his head all night long, is, "Do I fight recession and risk soaring inflation? Or do I fight inflation and risk depression? What would Alan do?"

    As we've said before, we feel Mr. Bernanke's experience studying the Great Depression will cause him to eventually allow inflation rather than risk Great Depression II. But that will bring its own challenges for us all.

    One more way in which today's economy differs from that of the 1970s is that countries in today's world are far more interconnected. This has two implications. First, growth will continue despite the U.S. slowdown. That sounds good, up to a point, because it makes recession less likely.

    The second point, however, is that, if Mr. Bernanke fights inflation too vigorously with higher interest rates, he will risk a global economic catastrophe which will be difficult to recover from.

    Bottom line, we think inflation will rise. Investors sense this, and that's why the dollar has been falling. Of course, this can become a vicious circle in which investors sell the dollar because it is falling, causing it to fall further, aggravating inflation, and giving investors even more reason to sell dollars.

    So what do you do in these troubled times? Buy inflation hedges -- things that likely to rise in value as the dollar falls. They will become the market leaders. Hold onto your gold stocks and oil service stocks for as long as the Fed's hands remain tied. A few tech stocks are not a bad idea for diversification. But our focus remains on energy and commodities. Having them in your portfolio will give you a better night's sleep in the years to come.
  2. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    Кстати, сделал апдейтик для FAX

    ------------------------------
     
  3. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    Защита от падающего доллара:

    FAX (картинка выше)

    gold, oil, platinum, palladium

    international bonds GIM, TEI

    currency fund DBV http://forex.kbpauk.ru/showthreaded....81/page/0/vc/1
    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=DBV

    Здесь его краткое описание : http://www.dbfunds.db.com/dbv/index.aspx

    (возникает вопрос на фиг, тогда, нужно вообще играть на Форкексе )

    Все фонды, в т.ч. документы, которые не открываются здесь: http://www.dbfunds.db.com/


    IGR (50% international RE)
    http://epaper.co.il/forum/index.php/...1.html#msg1931
    (ответ #19 от 28 февраля)
  4. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    Из вестника от Mauldin
    =======================

    My grandfather's generation made a deal with my children's generation. It goes like this. If you will pay into Social Security and pensions so we can retire now, we agree to die on time, or at least in a predictable manner. The Boomer generation is going to break the deal. We are going to live longer, and maybe a lot longer. And that is going to cause problems in pension plans and government retirement programs all over the world.

    Medicine as practiced today is still of the hammer and nails approach of the past 100 years. Our tools are better today, but the approach is the same. We wait for something to get bad and then we try and fix it. We get regular check-ups to try and diagnose any problems, and our ability to diagnose is getting better, but we still miss a lot. We work at doing what we can to prevent sickness, but our tools are not as good as we would like - basically, diet and exercise and a few medicines that try to prevent disease.

    That is getting ready to change. Image scanners are becoming ever more fine-grained. Just a few years ago it was 32 lines per inch. Then it went to 64, 128, and now 256. 512 is only a few years away. Recognize that pattern? It is going the same way as chips and storage media. Within 5 years we will see a new generation of scanners that will make today's obsolete. Within 10-12 years we will be doing scans that will allow for much more detail in full three-dimensional color. They will be seeing the early formation of plaque and tumors and have the therapies to deal with them before they become a matter of life and death.

    They are building chips which can diagnose all manner of disease by simply putting a drop of blood on the chip. Today, the chips can only diagnose a few diseases, but within 15-20 years it will be a thousand or more. Chips will be cheap and you will be able to get yourself checked often. Hopefully they will allow them to be hooked into your home computer and notify your health care provider if there is an issue. It will be a hypochondriac's heaven.

    There are almost a dozen new technologies for dealing with Alzheimer's, most of which are already in human trials. Sometime in the next decade, Alzheimer's and dementia may be a thing of the past, assuming you take charge.

    New genetic therapies are cropping up on almost a daily basis. Mice have 99% of the human genome, so we experiment on them a lot. There are mice that cannot get fat, no matter how much they eat. Mice that do not lose muscle mass. Couch potatoes of the world, unite! Mice that live 30% longer with the addition of just one hormone, the same hormone that is in our bodies. They are growing new liver cells from adult stem cells. The list goes on and on.

    Of course, these are not yet in human trials, and skeptics suggest it will be a long time before they do go into human trials. I am not so sure. They are using adult stem cells in Brazil on patients with a certain type of very nasty disease caused by a bug bite, which creates problems in the heart that show up later in life. It is 100% fatal once it starts. For some reason, Brazilian doctors decided to inject adult stem cells into their patients. Taking adult stem cells seems to slow or halt the effect on the heart. They don't know why it works, but the point is they are doing it. Ad hoc human clinical trials. What will be the next thing tried? And where?

    We may not see a lot of the human trials in the US with some of the more intriguing therapies, but it is my bet that we will see them elsewhere. Living 30% longer? No fat? No muscle loss? Someone, somewhere, is going to start the testing. I am not arguing the pros and cons of making humans guinea pigs (and I am not volunteering), just noting that I think it will happen.

    In short, we are going to start diagnosing and fixing things before they go wrong. Let's say for the sake of argument that by the end of the next decade it is likely that the average person will live 5 years longer and by 2025 will be living 10 years longer, numbers that Dr. Michael Roizen (YOU: The Owner's Manual) says are reasonable guesses. You can make a real case for those numbers. Some would say they are conservative. We are not talking immortality. Just that the diseases that kill people today will be dealt with. More people will live long enough to die of simple old age.

    Living longer is a very good thing, so why should I worry about that? Because I see the potential for black swans. Today, if you make it to 60, the odds are that you will live at least another 20 years and the last surviving spouse will live for 30 years. What if that goes to 25 and 40 years?

    My friend Ed Easterling at Crestmont Research did some very interesting analysis a few months ago. You have saved and invested, and now you want to retire. You decide to take out 5% of your total portfolio to live each year and increase the amount for inflation, so that you can maintain your lifestyle (a number which a surprising number of investment advisors would say is ok). Let's say you are an aggressive older couple and decide to stay in the stock market because that is where you are told that you can get the best returns over time. And you know that you have the probability of living 30 years. On average you are going to get 7-8% or more, right?

    Ed calculates what you would get for 78 different 30-year periods since 1900. Let's say you start with a million dollars. On average, this has been a good bet. You could maintain your lifestyle and end up with $3.6 million. You've been pretty conservative, right?

    Wrong. Because the returns you get over the next 30 years are highly dependent on the P/E ratios at the beginning of those 30 years. Let's break up those 30-year periods into four quartiles of beginning valuation. If you start in a period when P/E ratios are in the highest quartile, you find that over 50% of the time you end up penniless, on average within 22 years. Here's that data from Ed:



    Where are we on valuations today? You go to S&P's web site and you find that core P/E's are 17.4 (mikki33: 18.3!!! according to http://www.decisionpoint.com/TAC/SWENLIN.html ), at the upper end of the second highest quartile. Notice that even when starting with the lowest-quartile valuations that 5% of the time you ran out of money within 23 years. Want to take a lifestyle bet that you have a 1 in 20 chance of losing? As Ed points out, it will not be fun to have to go to work as a WalMart greeter at 80.

    Now, let's throw my assertion that one of the surviving spouses is going to live on average 10 years longer. The failure ratio, meaning that you run out of money, gets a lot higher. And it gets worse if you use a traditional mix of stocks and bonds, because bonds lower the overall return.

    The point is that retirement planning is going to get a lot more difficult. And we are going to have a generation who will be in their '70s when they realize the good news is that they will live longer but the bad news is that they can't afford it. And the bad news is that they are going to want the government to step in and help. And by that I mean they are going to need more tax dollars.

    Let's think of some of the implications. First, we already know that the large majority of US citizens have not saved enough for retirement. But for those that think they have, they may be budgeting for a future that is going to be a lot longer than they plan.

    Second, this is going to cause a massive problem with pensions and annuities. Defined-benefit pension funds and annuities are based on current mortality tables. If you add 10 years to their future budgets in 2025, they become massively underfunded at some point in the latter part of the next decade. This is especially worrisome for smaller annuity firms, as they have no source of new infusions. They were funded on the basis of an initial cash input.

    Third, public pension funds at the state and local levels will be in real trouble. They are already underfunded by perhaps as much as $1 trillion. In 40 states it is illegal to cut or change pension guarantees. Many cities are already battling with underfunded fire and police pensions, as politicians made deals with unions that future generations will have to pay for.

    In both Europe and the US, where governments have promised pension benefits, their costs are going to go up. Social Security in the US will start to be more painful in just 15 years than the pain we have already projected today. Don't even get me started on Medicare. Yes, we will be less sick, but those new treatments and therapies will not be cheap. And since the largest part of medical expenses occur in the last year of life, we will just be postponing the costs, not getting rid of them.

    For most of the people in this room, living longer is not going to be a financial issue. But it is sobering to think about the societal issues with which we will be dealing.

    Let's look at some of the consequences. Because of the ever-increasing costs of public pensions, you can look for substantially higher local taxes in cities where they have old legacy pension programs. That will mean that newer cities which did not make the pension fund promises will have a relative advantage. As we will see from the next trend, moving to and working from lower tax venues is going to be easier than ever.

    You can count on higher income taxes in the US, and a shift in where funds are spent in Europe. Most agricultural subsidies will be history by the middle of the decade in both the US and Europe. Ethanol subsidies will go by the end of the next decade.

    (ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ дальше)
  5. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ
    ============

    You can make book that Social Security and their equivalents in Europe will be means tested and taxes raised. Pension payouts from private funds will have to be scaled back. All this will cause a lot of angst among voters, and politicians will put off any meaningful reform until there is a true crisis.

    But there are a few opportunities. Life insurance companies are going to benefit, as their payout schedules will lengthen due to longer-lived policy holders. Major new health-care and drug companies will be created. We will need more housing, as longer-living Boomers will need to live somewhere. I think there will be a real opportunity in real estate in certain countries where it is cheaper to retire.

    Quickly, there are some things that should be done to mitigate the problems, but they are unlikely to be done in the current political environment. We should raise the retirement age more quickly. When Social Security was started, the average lifespan was 65. We have only added a few years to the age when you can first receive benefits.

    We should go ahead and put Boomers on notice that means testing will gradually be introduced. We should make the growth of the payments less in the early years. We should encourage more immigration so as to have more people paying into the system.
  6. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    Любопытно, что приведенный ниже кусок может быть продолжением.

    опять BULL-not-bull со своими мрачными прогнозами...
    Он уже 4 года предрекает сильные падения. Я все жду, когда же он наконец будет прав.

    "Инфляция, ДАУ 13К и Вторая Великая Депрессия" (enjoy)
    http://bullnotbull.com/archive/dow13k-1.html
  7. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    The DCDC Global Startegic Trends Programme 2007-2036

    Мир в котором мы живем и перспективы на 30 следующих лет
    Поможет понять как инвестировать


    Strategic Trends is an independent view of the future produced by the Development,
    Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC), a Directorate General within the UK’s Ministry of
    Defence (MOD). It is a source document for the development of UK Defence Policy.

    http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/5CB29...ds_23jan07.pdf

    (106 страниц)
  8. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    http://investmentpostcards.wordpress...hat-to-expect/



    В прошедшую пятницу этот Р/Е был 18.8...
    значит за 10 следующих лет мы можем увидеть от -2.6% до +12.2% годовых (+5.1% в среднем)
  9. 8
    Комментарии
    0
    Темы
    8
    Репутация Pro
     
    Новичок

    2 Медалей
    Жаль то не обновляете больше.
  10. 424
    Комментарии
    12
    Темы
    426
    Репутация Pro
    Аватар для mikki33  
    В начале пути

    4 Медалей
    М. Макаров здесь больше не работает. Возражать мне некому. А монолог сам по себе не интересен.


    Здесь еще что-то было:
    http://www.procapital.ru/showthread....3150#post73150

Вверх
РегистрацияX

чтобы писать, читать, комментировать